0points
Phase 1: Problem Discovery

Validating Your Problem

35 min
Lesson 3 of 16
🎯 4 Activities

You've identified a problem. But is it worth solving? In this lesson, you'll learn how to validate that your problem is real, significant, and worth building a solution for.

▶️

How to Evaluate Startup Ideas

Kevin Hale • Y Combinator

Why watch this: Kevin Hale, YC Partner and founder of Wufoo, shares the exact framework Y Combinator uses to evaluate startup ideas. Learn what makes a problem worth solving.

🧠

Why Validate?

What is the #1 reason startups fail?

ARunning out of money
BBad team dynamics
CStrong competition
DBuilding something nobody wants

"Nice to Have" vs. "Must Have"

Critical Distinction

"Nice to Have": People acknowledge the problem but aren't actively trying to solve it. They'll say "that would be cool" but won't pay.

"Must Have": People are actively searching for solutions. They're spending time or money RIGHT NOW to fix it.

If you're not solving a hair-on-fire problem, you're going to have a hard time getting anyone to pay attention.
— Michael Seibel, Y Combinator
🔥

Hair on Fire Test

You interview 10 people about your problem. Here's what you hear:

Which response indicates a "must have" problem?

A"Yeah, that's annoying. I've just learned to deal with it."
B"That would be cool to have! Let me know when you build it."
C"I spent 3 hours last week building a spreadsheet to try to solve this. When can I get your solution?"

🔥 That's a Hair-on-Fire Problem!

When people are already investing time/money on workarounds AND ask when they can get your solution, you've found real demand. This is the gold standard of validation.

⚠️ Polite Interest ≠ Demand

"That would be cool" is a red flag. People say yes to be nice. Without evidence they're actively trying to solve it, this is probably a "nice to have."

💡 Not Painful Enough

If people have "learned to deal with it," the problem isn't urgent enough. They won't pay for a solution when they've already adapted.

Market Sizing: TAM, SAM, SOM

📊

Market Sizing Terms

= Total Addressable Market (the whole pie)

= Serviceable Addressable Market (your slice)

= Serviceable Obtainable Market (realistic near-term target)

The Validation Sprint

Here's how to validate your problem in one week:

📅

Match the Sprint Days

Match each phase to its activity:

Day 1-2
Day 3-5
Day 6-7
Talk to 10-15 people
Define your hypothesis
Analyze & decide

⚠️ Red Flags: Signs to Pivot

  • "That's interesting, but..." — Polite disinterest
  • Can't find people to interview — Market too small
  • No current solutions — Not painful enough
  • "I'd use it if it was free" — Not validation!
🚩

Spot the Red Flag

Which interview response is a RED FLAG?

A"I've tried three different apps to solve this"
B"When can I sign up?"
C"I'd definitely use it if it was free"
D"I spent $50 last month on this problem"
📝

Define Your Validation Hypothesis

Planning

Write out exactly what you're trying to validate:

Example Hypothesis

WHO: First-generation college students at large state universities, typically 18-22, whose parents didn't attend college in the US

WHAT: They don't know how to navigate internship recruiting—when to apply, how to network, what companies look for

WHY: Without family connections or knowledge of "the game," they miss opportunities and fall behind peers

CURRENT WORKAROUND: They Google random advice, ask overwhelmed career counselors, or just skip internships altogether

HYPOTHESIS: I believe first-gen students at large universities struggle with internship recruiting because they lack the informal knowledge that students with connected families have, and they currently rely on generic online advice that doesn't address their specific challenges.

📊

Size Your Market

Analysis

Estimate your market size using TAM, SAM, SOM:

Example Market Sizing

TAM: All US college students seeking internships = ~8 million × $200 avg spend on career prep = $1.6B

SAM: First-gen students actively job searching = ~2 million × $100 realistic price = $200M

SOM: Students at 20 target universities in Year 1 = 50,000 × $50 = $2.5M

Assessment: Yes, big enough. $2.5M year 1 can sustain a small team, and there's room to expand to $200M+ if we nail the value prop.

📋

Interview Results Tracker

Validation

Track your validation interviews and look for patterns:

Example Interview Tracker

Interview 1 - Maria (junior, first-gen): "I had no idea companies start recruiting in fall of sophomore year. I missed the whole cycle." Pain: 9/10. Currently: nothing, gave up on big companies.

Interview 2 - James (senior, first-gen): "My roommate's dad got him an internship. I applied to 80 places cold—got nothing." Pain: 8/10. Currently: mass-applying online.

Interview 3 - Sarah (career counselor): "First-gen students are 40% of our school but 10% of who gets internships. We can't give them enough 1-on-1 time." Pain: 7/10. Currently: group workshops.

Patterns: Consistent high pain (8+/10). Problem is timing/knowledge, not effort. Current solutions aren't working. Strong emotional responses.

Decision: YES, continue. Clear pattern of pain, people are trying to solve it, and existing solutions are failing them.

🔍

Pattern Recognition: Red Flags

Score: 0
Interview Feedback Summary
12
Interviews
9
Said "sounds cool"
2
Asked to pay now
0
Using alternatives

Based on this data, what's the biggest red flag?

Only 9 out of 12 said "sounds cool" — need more positive feedback
Zero people are using alternatives — no one is trying to solve this
Only 12 interviews — need a bigger sample size
Only 2 offered to pay — not enough demand

🎯 Key Takeaways

  • Validation prevents building something nobody wants
  • "Must have" problems show active solution-seeking behavior
  • Talk to 10-15 people before deciding if a problem is worth solving
  • Red flags are valuable—they save you time
  • Document interviews to make objective decisions